QUOTE (Maryanne @ Jun 1 2006, 11:07 am)

Should this not be clarified in the contract as it is not mentioned and was an oversight on my behalf. Is the consumer not protected equally. The one thing in my favour is I never signed the contract extension when the last lease ran out.
I understand your thinking, but I don't think that's how it works here. Just because you have not signed an extension, does not mean you are not bound to standard terms. It is not that uncommon for renters to stay beyond contract terms without extensions, sometimes for many years. At least the rent doesn't go up that way. And yes, you and the landlord are equally protected by the 3 month requirement. It would not be equal if you had to give only 1 month, but he could not get rid of you in less than 3.
QUOTE (Owain Glyndwr @ Jun 1 2006, 11:13 am)

if a notice period is not stated explicitly in the contract, the legal minimum period is applicable, which, as has already been stated, is 3 months. Should you wish TRY and get away with less, do as Keydeck suggested, you may be lucky. The landlord has the legal right to insist on 3 months, though.
If the there is a Provision (agent fee), then there is a higher chance you will be on the hook for the entire 3 months, if you rely on the agent to find the person. It is my understanding that you have a right to present prospective tenants to the landlord. He/she can reject up to two or three people, or something like that for good reason (or maybe no reason). If you're really in a pinch and the landlord is no help, you should advertise the apartment here, of course, and maybe even consider paid classifieds. (search TT for much, much more on this topic)
Unless your landlord has already proven to be incredibly difficult to deal with, go to him first and try to work it out. If you're the victim of circumstances beyond your control -- something more than getting dumped or just wanting to move -- explain the details in a non-emotional way.